CMA 945 of 2008
It was a case relating to motor vehicala Act and we represented repondents 1 and 2. The Tribunal had awarded a sum of more than 50, 000 even before 10 years and the Insurance company, the appellant had come against the order in appeal. I have had witnessed this case getting simply passed over and indefinite adjournemenet in the last 4 months and I believe this being the case for years for the parties in this case are so many and so the counsels who represent them, so it was practically difficlut for every lawyers to present together when the matter was called to make theri submissions. however the Judge asked the appellant counsel to make his submisison and after it was over, the matter was posted for respondents areguments. Sincer we represented the 1st and 2nd respondent, everytime the matter reached, i was asked by the Judge if i was ready but I would never give him an affirmative answer. instead i would alwyas get an agdjourent.
A day came when i lost my patience. i felt embarrased about myself for i thougth i was the casue for the case being prolonged and when i informed about the situatuion to my senior who in reponse simply told me via a sms "you argue its a good case". I could not believe it in my eyes that i received such a message, so when the matter reached on that day i immidiatley tool an adjournenmt amiss severe critisisim from the other side who blamed me one more time for proonging the case however this time i had serios intientin to prepare and come and argue next time. so i told the judge how i am goung to attack the very asha rani case which the opponent cousnel is relying on for theuir contention.
No comments:
Post a Comment